Which voting strategy entails evaluating candidates based on their promises for future actions?

The correct answer focuses on the concept of evaluating candidates based on their future intentions and policy proposals. This approach is known as prospective judgment. Voters who use this strategy assess candidates primarily on their articulated plans for future actions and the likelihood that those plans will be implemented if they are elected.

In prospective judgment, voters look at the candidates’ campaign promises, policy agendas, and potential impact on society, deciding who seems best equipped to address future challenges. This method emphasizes forward-looking evaluation rather than merely reflecting on past performances or outcomes.

Other strategies, such as retrospective judgment, involve comparing current candidates to their predecessors, emphasizing past actions and results rather than future plans. Informed voting pertains to being knowledgeable about candidates and their positions but does not specifically denote the focus on future promises. Thus, the emphasis on future commitments clearly makes prospective judgment the appropriate choice for this question.